News

1. Comments are cramming up the pages. So I have added a comment summary to each post.

Evolution Debunked

Did you know that evolution has been debunked? In fact it was being debunked from its birth. But it is still being talked about and being held as a scientific fact because there are people who are not honest to throw away what has been debunked.

Here are some irrefutable arguments. They have not been refuted and cannot be refuted. When however the supporters of evolution are presented with these arguments they just plainly ignore them. Let me present some of them.
  • To evolve means to develop gradually. But there are no evidence that anything evolved to become better by itself. If anything has evolved to the better, it is always trough the intervention of intelligence.
  • Whatever combination of gases or chemicals cannot create life. Anything that has life, has information in it and gases and chemicals do not create information.
  • Changes that happen to a kind of animal over a period of time is called evolution. While we can call it evolution there is no evidence that this will eventually lead to one kind of animal changing into another kind of animal. 
Evolution is not possible. It can't happen. If you are holding on to evolution then you are thinking properly and are not looking at he evidences that are provided against it. You just want it to be there so that you can avoid God. Let me tell you this - even if you close your eyes to God, He still exists and by denying Him you are heading towards eternal destruction.

6 comments:

  1. The Reverend Toni Rigatoni (CotFSM)16 September 2012 at 10:34

    Have you read any science books? Provide evidence of the intelligent intervention in the development of the eye from a simple light sensitive cell such as in a worm for example to the complex organ in a human or a bird of prey for example. Nope, didn't think so. I could however present you with a geological and paleontological time line of its evolution, although I suspect that you would claim that it was god's plan to test our faith or some other piece of garbage you have bought into.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is what you guys always do. You just keep repeating your statements about timelines. Would you care to comment about the simple 3 arguments I have provided?

      Delete
    2. The Reverend Toni Rigatoni (CotFSM)19 September 2012 at 14:10

      My second sentence although presented as a question, refers directly to your first point, the eye has evolved from a light sensitive cell to the eye of a bird of prey that can spot its lunch from hundreds of feet in the air. The birds eye, in many respects is better than the human eye; surely if we are god's chosen he would have saved the best for us? The fact is the eyes of different species have evolved, yes EVOLVED, to the benefit of any particular species. You have not answered my first question but your 'simple 3 arguments' as you put it have revealed that the answer is a resounding 'NO', if you had you would know the answers to the statements, and you would certainly NOT state that evolution cannot exist, evolution is why you are here, is why everything is here...please please read some books other than your bible, it's keeping you from appreciating the true wonder and beauty of the world of which you are a part. You have but one life, don't waste it preparing for the next one, there ain't one, trust me.

      May the Sauce be with you.

      The Reverend

      Delete
    3. You must understand that God made us perfect. God gave you what you need. You are not flying and therefore you don't need a birds eye.

      As you know there are two kinds of evolution. Micro and Macro. Micro evolution is evolution within the same kind of animals. There are evidences that this could happen and we know it. Dogs, foxes, wolves, jackals etc could be evolved from one ancestor.

      But Macro evolution is one kind of animal evolving into another kind altogether. It is based on this that they say, that all living creatures evolved from a single celled organism. There are no evidence for this and you can't show evidence of Micro evolution and say Macro evolution is possible.

      You however have still not addressed to the 3 simple arguments I have stated.

      Delete
    4. I'll bite.

      "To evolve means to develop gradually. But there are no evidence that anything evolved to become better by itself. If anything has evolved to the better, it is always trough the intervention of intelligence."
      Oh? ever hear about Darwin's voyage? About the Galapagos finches? The beaks changed to eat different kinds of seeds, making it easier to eat the seeds, and better. There's your example. Alternatively, you can read the Reverend's answer.

      "Whatever combination of gases or chemicals cannot create life. Anything that has life, has information in it and gases and chemicals do not create information."
      That's odd. I was pretty sure that pretty much everything has elements in it (which, by the way, are what chemicals are made of). If arranged in a certain way, I'm assuming it could have formed an early (and outdated) cell. Oh, and you know that DNA we all have? It's made of adenine, cytosine, guanine or thymine, the nitrogenous bases, and a phosphate group. In other words,the nitrogenous bases are basically the information. But that's in a modern cell, an older cell would have been less complicated.

      "Changes that happen to a kind of animal over a period of time is called evolution. While we can call it evolution there is no evidence that this will eventually lead to one kind of animal changing into another kind of animal."
      Ever hear of the fossil record? It shows how certain animals have changed over the years, you can even look at an embryo for proof. The whale, for example, used to be a land creature. Unless you're saying that if a person lost their legs and arms, gained fins, and flukes over time, they would still be human? Speaking of which, what defines a human? Is it our particular body shape, our ability to talk, or our ability to think? In the part of talking, there are mute people, so it can't be that. As for thinking, we have no evidence, as far as I know, that animals can't think, so I'll disregard that unless evidence comes up. In fact, I'd think that animals can think. If you have a dispenser that gave out food whenever they did something right, they would start doing it more. This shows it can learn, but if it couldn't think, how could it make a connection between the food and the action? So that leaves the human shape. That means that you would call a human that developed into a sort of fish human.

      Delete
    5. *******Oh? ever hear about Darwin's voyage? About the Galapagos finches? The beaks changed to eat different kinds of seeds, making it easier to eat the seeds, and better. There's your example. Alternatively, you can read the Reverend's answer.*****

      That is Micro Evolution which is a specious evolving within itself. That does happen. As I had already said, I don't disagree.


      ******In other words,the nitrogenous bases are basically the information. But that's in a modern cell, an older cell would have been less complicated.*******

      These bases are not the information themselves. But the sequencing of these bases is the way information is stored. Where did information come from? However simple the cell would have been it would need information to be alive.


      ****fossil record****

      Fossils are just that - fossils. It is man who winds a story around the
      fossils.


      ******The whale, for example, used to be a land creature.******

      That is a false story. If you want to believe such stories then your are welcome.

      Delete